Security efficiency · Security detection
Continuously improve detections
Detection rules become noisy, incomplete, or outdated as threats, infrastructure, and normal business behavior change.
The record
Telemetry these decisions draw on
- Alert outcomes
- Confirmed incidents
- False-positive history
- Missed attack stages
- Telemetry availability
- Detection-rule changes
- Analyst dispositions
- Threat-research findings
The questions
What an agent answers
- Which rules create the most false positives?
- Which attack stages are not covered?
- What telemetry was missing from prior incidents?
- Which detections no longer provide value?
- How should the rule be changed?
"The existing rule detects credential creation but misses credential use from a new region. Add geography, device, and service-account context to improve precision."
Related use cases
Browse the full library →Security efficiency
Reconstruct a complete cyber incident
Investigators must manually collect and correlate evidence across many systems to determine how an attacker entered, moved, persisted, and accessed data.
Investigations and forensics · Chief Information Security Officer
Read the use case →Security efficiency
Recommend the safest security response
Containment decisions can protect the enterprise but also create unnecessary business disruption when the scope of compromise is not understood.
AI-driven decisions · Chief Information Security Officer
Read the use case →Security efficiency
Reduce security false positives
Analysts spend significant time reviewing alerts that lack the user, asset, change, threat, and business context required to determine whether they are dangerous.
AI-driven decisions · Chief Information Security Officer
Read the use case →