Security efficiency · AI-driven decisions
Recommend the safest security response
Containment decisions can protect the enterprise but also create unnecessary business disruption when the scope of compromise is not understood.
The record
Telemetry these decisions draw on
- Identity and session activity
- Asset criticality
- Application dependencies
- Current transaction volumes
- Attack-path evidence
- Available containment controls
- Prior response outcomes
The questions
What an agent answers
- What is the minimum action required to contain the threat?
- Can the affected identity or service be isolated without shutting down the business process?
- Which credentials or tokens must be revoked?
- What should remain online?
- How should the response be monitored?
"Do not shut down the entire payment environment. The compromise is limited to one service account. Disable the account, rotate its key, block the affected API path, and continue monitoring."
Related use cases
Browse the full library →Security efficiency
Reconstruct a complete cyber incident
Investigators must manually collect and correlate evidence across many systems to determine how an attacker entered, moved, persisted, and accessed data.
Investigations and forensics · Chief Information Security Officer
Read the use case →Security efficiency
Reduce security false positives
Analysts spend significant time reviewing alerts that lack the user, asset, change, threat, and business context required to determine whether they are dangerous.
AI-driven decisions · Chief Information Security Officer
Read the use case →Security efficiency
Automate repetitive investigation work
Analysts repeatedly gather the same identity, device, threat, asset, and timeline evidence before they can make an initial decision.
Investigations and forensics · Chief Information Security Officer
Read the use case →